If You Can’t Heal ‘Em, Beat ‘Em?

The following post is a modified portion of a chapter from “Defining Deception.”

Why in the world does church history matter? That’s a question more Christians should be able to answer – and a highly important one at that.

In his phenomenal work, Why Church History Matters, Robert F. Rea defines history as “the study of the past in order to understand the present and improve the future.”[1] History teaches us valuable lessons about the good, the bad, and the ugly. It teaches us about the nature of the way things have been and how they came to be. These are certainly lessons we do well to learn because they remind us that even the best of men are still men at best. Furthermore, lessons from history provide us with the motivation to change the future, even when it’s painful to face the facts.

Unfortunately, and far too often, we tend to idealize past figures because death is the great equalizer and it’s considered poor form to talk ill of the dead.  But where does that refusal of the facts leave us? Are we to simply brush over swaths of historical mayhem by saying, “Well, nobody’s perfect”? Is it prudent, or even Christian, to turn a blind eye to those who call violent abusers and scripture-twisting manipulators heroic? Denial is never an option when seeking the truth – in fact, it’s downright impossible.

At the risk of tearing down the sacred cows of the past we must be committed to giving our children a hopeful future – a future founded on biblical truth. Nobody is perfect, but Christians who proudly find their roots in certain erroneous theologies are in desperate need of a reality check regarding those who introduced those belief systems. Such beliefs and practices are found nowhere in the Bible.

If “history is the endeavor to provide accountability to the present in light of the past,”[2] proper understanding of history is an imperative need. In light of that need, here is a historical faith healer who is still revered as a general of the Christian faith but need be known for what he always was.

Smith Wigglesworth (1859–1947)

Wigglesworth was one of the first to take faith healing to violent new heights. He is considered Pentecostal and Charismatic royalty these days, but that’s mostly because people are ignorant of his aberrant and unbiblical ministry tactics. For nearly two decades of my own life, Wigglesworth was one of my heroes because he represented audacious faith without any regard for the confines of religiosity and tradition. He was a reckless rebel and, just like Peter, was willing to jump over the side of the boat to walk on water and follow Jesus. That’s the kind of risk-taking that God always blesses, I often thought. That’s who I wanted to be! wigglesworth

Born before both Charles Parham and William Seymour, Wigglesworth outlived them both. Due to his long life span, he was perfectly positioned to almost single handedly impact the UK in the same way Parham and Seymour impacted America.

Wigglesworth focused the core of his ministry on signs and wonders like healing, miracles, and tongues. He taught that believers should refuse medical treatment for any illness. If not the first, he was one of the first in history to conduct his faith healing using methods other than laying on of hands—though he still touched them. According to Wigglesworth, sickness was demonic activity so he would physically attack the person as though they were the devil! Ignoring biblical teaching that spiritual warfare has nothing to do with flesh and blood (Eph. 6:12), Wigglesworth would punch, slap, or hit people in the place where they were afflicted. Wigglesworth explains his reason for assaulting sick people:

There are some times when you pray for the sick and you are apparently rough. But you are not dealing with a person, you are dealing with the satanic forces that are binding that person. Your heart is full of love and compassion to all, but you are moved to a holy anger as you see the place the devil has taken position in the body of the sick one, and you deal with his position with a real forcefulness.[3]

If people didn’t get healed, he was sure to place the blame on the sick. Wigglesworth taught that everyone should be able to control their own healing. He blamed those who couldn’t rid themselves of sickness on their own sin and lack of faith. He declared, “Is healing for all? It is for all who press right in and get their portions.”[4] To one sick woman he barked, “If you’ll get rid of your self-righteousness, God will do something for you. Drop the idea that you are so holy that God has got to afflict you. Sin is the cause of your sickness.”[5] He also states, “There is a close relationship between sin and sickness . . . but if you will obey God and repent of your sin and quit it, God will meet you, and neither your sickness nor your sin will remain.”[6] With no regard for biblical teaching on praying and trusting God’s will, God’s purposes through physical trials, and sanctification from unhealed sickness (Gal. 4:13-14; James 1:2-3), Wigglesworth confused and spiritually abused those who were sick and desperate by telling them they were the problem and he was the solution. He was especially aggressive toward anyone who approached him for prayer more than once. One poor man experienced public humiliation when Wigglesworth came to the altar and asked the faith healer to pray for him a second time because he wasn’t yet healed. Wigglesworth yelled, “Didn’t I pray for you last night? You are full of unbelief, get off this platform.”[7] His method of placing the blame on innocent people for his own failed healing attempts, and his violent antics for trying to heal people, are still practiced today by many false teachers. Later on in the book, we’ll get an up close look a modern day preacher who, like Wigglesworth, assaults people when praying for their healing.

People merely searching for hope were devastated when men like Wigglesworth humiliated them with his shameful practices. Still, countless modern day Pentecostal and Charismatic preachers ignore the hard facts of history and consider Wigglesworth a hero of the faith. Regardless of modern sentiment, Wigglesworth was a charlatan who exploited the sick by teaching falsely about salvation, sin, and sickness. His legacy does not represent true Christianity nor the character of biblical leadership.

Those who wish to faithfully represent Christ must arm themselves with truth. The dark history of abusive false teachers is not where Christians should ever find their truth, or claim their heritage.  Look to God’s word for timeless guidance – it will never disappoint.

[1] Robert F. Rea, Why Church History Matters (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2014), 23.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Smith Wigglesworth, Ever Increasing Faith (Springfield, MO: Gospel Publishing House, 1924), 135–36.

[4] Ibid., 37.

[5] Ibid., 38.

[6] Wigglesworth, Ever Increasing Faith, 41.

[7] Julian Wilson, Wigglesworth: The Complete Story (Tyrone, GA: Authentic Media, 2004), 82–83.

15 thoughts on “If You Can’t Heal ‘Em, Beat ‘Em?

  1. Thank you, I have always wondered about Wigglesworth. This answers many of my questions. Can’t wait for the book. Hope it will be available in South Africa? God bless you.

    1. Hi A.C., He was an amazing man of faith. A truly Godly man. I can’t apologize for his ways, but our Lord doesn’t either. If he ever “hurt” anyone they were healed. People misunderstand him. I’ll bet God doesn’t. I’ll also bet God is pleased with him. Oh that there were more like him. He was a plain man who knew God and hallowed His Name.
      God’s Blessings to you

  2. Wigglesworth is buried in my home town in England. You are correct, he is regarded as royalty, without a single reference to historical outrageous behaviour. Over the last few decades, I cannot quantify the sheer number of people who have commented on the fact he was from this area. It’s almost as if he was the only person who lived here 🙂 Unbelievably, people visit the grave to somehow access his anointing. It’s bizarre.

  3. It should also be noted that Wigglesworth was accused of and admitted to sexual misconduct with 2 separate women. When his denomination, the Pentecostal Missionary Union was informed they demanded his resignation from ministry and public life. Wigglesworth refused claiming that God had forgiven him and he chastised the leadership of the PMU for not standing with him. His pride would not allow him to submit to the authority under which God had placed him.

    1. No excuse for that nor for King Davids. Once repented and forgiven did God continue to use King David? Sincerely

    2. I don’t know that this is true, friend. I’ve seen a blog post about this, but when I look it up, that’s the only source anywhere on the internet making reference to it. Not defending wigglesworth’s theology, but I think this is a lie to discredit him more easily.

  4. For maybe 20 years I was a big Wigglesworth admirer. As a young Christian, I never questioned his method, I just wanted to be like him. However, as I grew as a Christian and became much more familiar with God’s word, I began to question Wigglesworth’s methodology as it does not line up with what we read in the Bible. Whenever there is a discrepancy between what the Bible teaches and what a ‘celebrity’ preacher says or does, Scripture must win every time.

    1. Thank you for this great article. For many years I wanted to have faith like this man to heal others. Even attempting for a season after reading books on Wigglesworth and Kathern Kuhlmann; I would go out into the streets, coffee shops and pray for the sick. Sadly, not much happened. Obviously, this left me confused. Once I realize my sin, it was clear and obvious I had put far too much faith in these people rather than in Jesus Christ or in rightly knowing his word. Great to know the undisclosed, deeper underlying truths of Wigglesworth life which really humanize him. It also shows us, how far and wide this false gospel has spread over the many years.

  5. I always felt Smith was one of those special people who had such a great anointing and lived such a holy life. I even tried to find some dirt on him, but could not, I thought this was proof that he was legit and a hero of the faith. But one of the things that made me rethink his legacy was the sheer promotion that WOF preachers gave him, where other Pentecostal denominations either knew little about him or didn’t see him the same as the WOF preachers did. Came to find out that he would punch and do other things that didn’t sound very Christ like.

  6. I read some of Smith Wigglesworth books, what c really bugged me was the idea, thatbis now so rampant, that if you weren’t headed, you didn’t have enough faith. I studied the bible daily and knew that was beyond stupid. It really upsets me that other people still backdate this man as a man of God, and because of him, we have people such as Todd Bentley, Benny Hinn, and Katharine Kuhlman.

    1. Amy, I would say not because of him. The counterfeits always flocked to the real one. I know he had issues, don’t we all. I’m not excusing him, but I believe he had a true heart for God. Sorry if I upset you. Even Saul (truly stupid) gets a better review. Really, “because of him, we have people such as Todd Bentley, Benny Hinn, and Katharine Kuhlman”. God’s blessings to you.

Leave a Reply to Jack harper Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s